Shut up, they explained

 Don't be a conspiracy theorist, they said. Follow the experts, they said.

Catching up with Covid-related links

Some news items and analysis you might not have seen:

• Contrary to what you might have heard, that there have been "recent increased hospitalization rates" in children, those rates have, by the CDC's own data, decreased by 61% since April (and were very low to begin with). "A smaller subset of states reported on hospitalizations and mortality by age; the available data indicate that COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death is uncommon in children. At this time, it still appears that severe illness due to COVID-19 is rare among children."

• Where did the virus originate? 

• What do Dr. Fauci's emails reveal so far?

• Is the jab causing bleeding and miscarriage? 

• Is the Second Shot Giving Young Men a Dangerous Heart Condition? and before you say "that's anecdotal" or "correlation does not prove causation," let's just remember that the shot is experimental and thus the effects by definition will be anecdotal until studied. That's how studies come about: someone observes effects and then studies them. Shockingly, the jabs are handed out willy-nilly. (I read one news report months ago that mentioned a specialized freezer breaking down and nurses going out on the streets to find people to give the shot to before it expired!) There is clearly very little follow-up, nor is there screening done beforehand. 

• Relatedly: Highly cited COVID doctor comes to stunning conclusion: Gov’t ‘scrubbing unprecedented numbers’ of injection-related deaths. "McCullough holds the honor of being the most cited medical doctor on COVID-19 treatments at the National Library of Medicine, with more than 600 citations. He has testified before Congress and won numerous awards during his distinguished medical career."

• Evidence that the studies have been "unblinded."

Some legitimate information that's being withheld

My friend Leila Miller has put together some important pieces that need to be looked into regarding the pandemic's origins, Dr. Fauci's role, the responses, and Bill Gates: Maybe We Are Not Angry Enough. Please go to LeilaMiller.net* to read this post. 

It's no good calling every question a conspiracy theory and then dismissing it. We have to be informed. I suggest taking the time to go through each aspect (article, video) that she includes in this post and look at the sources, not just the claims.

Is gain of function research inherently dangerous? What is Dr. Fauci's connection to the Wuhan lab and to the pandemic? Who is Bill Gates? What are his connections to every single global health care initiative and institution? What are his connections to major media outlets? 

Read the whole thing at LeilaMiller.net* (and read or watch the embedded things!).

*I have removed the link to Leila's post because I think it was causing my site here to be flagged as dangerous (for "ads that are misleading or potential phishing" -- which obviously her post is not, nor does my site have ads). We will see if the problem is remedied. But I really do urge you to take the time to copy and paste her URL and go read for yourself! 

Human DNA in the Covid vaccines

Eugenio Derbez interviews Dr. Fauci. (The introduction is in Spanish but actual video is in English.)

Eugenio Derbez: "Is that true that there is residual DNA from an aborted baby in the Johnson and Johnson?
Anthony Fauci: "No, there is no residual DNA that gets injected into you at all....there's no residual human fetal DNA at all."

Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine FDA insert, page 17: "Each dose may also contain residual amounts of host cell proteins (≤0.15 mcg) and/or host cell DNA (≤3 ng)."

For the layman, this question of human DNA in injections is not an easy one to navigate, especially when any discussion is scoffed at by vaccine promoters. But it is a question, a valid one. We can't be satisfied with "the experts know" -- we have a right to be informed before we consent to an injection for ourselves or for our children.

Dr. Theresa's Deisher’s letter on human DNA in the MMR states,

“Levels in our children can reach up to 5 ng/ml after vaccination, depending on the age, weight and blood volume of the child. That level is known to activate Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), which can cause autoimmune attacks.”

For comparison labor is induced by the child’s DNA mixing with her mother’s blood at lower levels:

“When they reach between 0.46– 5.08 ng/mL, they trigger labor via the TLR9 mechanism”

“The rubella portion of the MMR vaccine contains human derived fetal DNA contaminants of about 175 ngs, more than 10x over the recommended WHO threshold of 10 ng per vaccine dose[x].”

[x] Series, WHO Technical Report. WHO EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION 941; Deisher et al. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70

Dr. Fauci asserts these vaccines do not contain human DNA; the insert of the vaccine says it may. 3 ng is not zero. The FDA requires that these injections need only contain levels that equal a third of what is acceptable in the MMR. Levels, however, which are more than sufficient to induce an autoimmune response in infants. (Covid vaccine trials are beginning on babies as young as 6 months.) Who verifies that these levels are even met?