Showing posts with label Leila Miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leila Miller. Show all posts

Let's not abandon St. Monica, lest our children be abandoned

As we approach the feast of St. Monica, we will find ourselves deluged on social media, as we are every year, with hot takes about how not to use the saints to encourage women to stay in abusive marriages.

These takes are sometimes even dramatically accompanied by photos of models bound and gagged or cowering under a clenched fist, as if women everywhere are literally held prisoner by their monster husbands and are simply awaiting permission from their friendly neighborhood blogger to break free of the mental constraints imposed upon them by an irrational church, run by priests anxious to keep them in their shackles. Are there some women in mortal danger? The world is a big place, so the answer is yes. Does anyone think that those women should be beaten, bound, and gagged because of dear St. Monica or the truly wise and delicate Élisabeth Leseur? Of course not. But it's Straw Man Season out there.

Let's be realistic about the state of marriage today. Very few, including priests, dare tell a woman to keep her marriage together, for fear of being accused of supporting and enabling abuse, which has become a catch-all word for a spectrum of situations, not all of them even a little dire. 

Few have any idea how to encourage a woman in difficulty. No one knows how to help a couple recover and flourish. Many seem to have lost hope that a man can repent and change. Above all, no one feels comfortable urging discomfort and yes, suffering -- perhaps because we are all trying to avoid suffering ourselves in our worldliness. By my observation, even Catholic counselors, when told of a difficult situation, respond with advice to leave the union. 

But let's stop. Let's return to the unbroken (but now bent) teaching of the Church that marriage is indissoluble. Yes, the Church can find that a marriage never occurred with a declaration of nullity, but no power can dissolve what has occurred (and that is not what annulment means!). "What God has joined, let no man put asunder."  

We must stop giving people excuses for divorce. If there is a situation that truly puts anyone in danger, the Church has always allowed separation. Sometimes it is the only remedy, always with the hope of reform and reunion. 

Somehow, oddly, separation doesn't satisfy those anti-St.-Monica pundits. They want divorce and they want it now. It's almost as if they don't think that marriage is, indeed, indissoluble.

Here is the crux of the matter: Parents often say, with the sense of having stated something rather fine, rather exalted, that they would do anything -- suffer anything, up to and including death -- for their child. Yet, when a couple divorces, they put a knife through their child's heart. They demonstrate that in fact, there is quite a bit they would not do for their children. They deal a blow, in the name of happiness, from which a person will never fully recover. And we in our Church today do not help them do better. Shame on us when we forget the example given to us by our great saints and instead jettison their witness.

Primal Loss: The Now-Adult Children of Divorce Speak, a compilation of personal reflections, is the only book I know that conveys in a multi-faceted way that no one person could encompass on his own, the harm done to the child of divorce. Leila Miller, the compiler, has posted on her blog the insightful and important Foreword by Jennifer Roback Morse. Please read it, I beg you, before you give a big "you go girl, amen, preach" to those loud voices telling women to leave their marriage!

St. Monica, pray for us!


One woman's journey on a medical question

I urge you to read this post from Leila Miller, on her honest and self-accusing look at how she came to face the moral and political issues surrounding the question of vaccination, something that, as a person close to many medical professionals, she took for granted as being good and trustworthy. She writes:

My first child was born in 1991, and I did not hesitate to vaccinate her on schedule, just as I did with the next two children. About a year after my third child was born, the chickenpox vaccine came out to much fanfare, and I remember hesitating about that one. I wondered why it was such an important inoculation, because all of my generation had gotten chickenpox, and it was really not a big deal (aside from the itch)...

... As the years went by, all my children received all their shots on schedule—until the HPV vaccine (GARDASIL) came out. That one was a game-changer for me, as I was finally willing to reject one of the recommended vaccines. An injection to prevent a sexually-transmitted virus that might cause a highly curable cancer was a bridge too far. The hype around it did not make sense to me. I was not alone in questioning the shot, and several other pro-vaccine friends refused it for their children as well. 

... [however,] I still sat in judgment of a couple of friends who didn’t want their kids to get any shots. I had less judgment for those who were on a “delayed schedule,” but I still thought their caution was unnecessary. The “crunchy” Catholics, I admit, made me roll my eyes. Sure, reject the shots dealing with sexual transmission. I get that. But measles? Measles was making a comeback! We needed to be smart and sophisticated, not rubes and ignoramuses. 

I believed that the “anti-vax” sentiment was dangerous to society.  

... But there was always something bothering my conscience. Throughout all the years of vaccinating my eight children (and all ten of us getting our flu shots every year), there was an underlying ethical issue that I tried—mostly successfully—to ignore. .. that most vaccines in use were morally compromised, as they were produced by using the bodies of aborted human children. In other words, produced via a sophisticated cannibalism. I also learned the Church’s stance on the use of those abortion-tainted vaccines, namely that if there is only “remote material cooperation” involved, the shot may (not must) be taken. However, for a Catholic who makes the decision to take the shot, there is a moral obligation to speak out, to object, to demand the creation of an ethical alternative, and to make it difficult for the pharmaceutical companies to continue to make unethical vaccines. 

...  And then it was just a few years ago, probably a year or two before the Covid cult and vaccine idolatry, that my dear friend Leila Marie Lawler (the “other Leila”) started telling me that certain blue states were working to make it illegal for parents to opt out of vaccines for their children. Parents’ rights would be stripped, and no religious or conscience exemptions given for those enrolling in public schools. She gently warned me that power was changing hands from the parent to the state, and I needed to get on this bandwagon, and quickly. Once this blow against freedom and parental rights was enacted, there would be no going back... 

... With horror, I understood the obvious implications, and then I proceeded to … hide my head in the sand. I did nothing and said nothing publicly. It disturbed my peace to think about it, so I pulled a Scarlett O’Hara: I’d think about it another day. 

Read the whole thing

And when you have finished, I ask you, beg you, to watch the seven-minute video embedded here, especially if you doubt the moral centrality of the use of aborted baby cells in the research and development of these products (and more). Watch the body language of Stanley Plotkin, "godfather [sic] of modern vaccines." Watch his hands and eyes when he says this, if you are sure that the use of aborted babies in medical products is safely in the past:

The Catholic church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact and that, uh, that I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad to do. (emphasis added)

 

Waiting for Advent

Looking for some insight into the spiritual life? I suggest you read this post from Leila Miller: How we perceive the cross depends on our level of holiness...

Her common-sense explanation of the three stages of the spiritual road (and her further common-sense advice not to worry about figuring out where you are, as it tends to vary) can be a real help in understanding our struggle (aka The Cross).

For years now I've noticed that our hierarchy has pretty much abandoned this classical expression -- the Ways of Purgation, Illumination, and Union -- in favor of something much more psychological, that is to say emotion-based. I won't go into it too much here, but it's a shame, because the old framework had a lot more to offer us as far as getting us out of our earth-bound state. Simply put, it offered a way to heaven, where the psychological approach tends to leave us here with our problems.

In any case, there is a practical way to put this newfound old wisdom to work in our lives. If we want to get started on the three-fold way, we have only to follow the Liturgical Year. Daily and in its seasons, the Liturgical Year offers us ever-relevant wisdom and really, Christ Himself, to guide us along this tried-and-true path.

And that is why I have urged on my blog for over a decade now that we do our best to live Advent, the beginning of the Liturgical Year. It's not mean-spirited to say: wait to do things at their appointed time. On the contrary, it's the essence of the Purgative Way to do just that. Restraint and submission to something larger than ourselves -- something True and Beautiful -- give us the possibility of experiencing what we crave, namely Illumination (a deeper understanding of what is really meaningful in life) and leads us towards what we really need: Union with God.

Just as we ask our children to wait patiently for something good (because we know it's good for them -- this is our intuition about the Purgative Way), we must be willing to wait patiently ourselves. Let the Church lead you, step by step, and don't rush. This is the Way. This is the only Way.

Some legitimate information that's being withheld

My friend Leila Miller has put together some important pieces that need to be looked into regarding the pandemic's origins, Dr. Fauci's role, the responses, and Bill Gates: Maybe We Are Not Angry Enough. Please go to LeilaMiller.net* to read this post. 

It's no good calling every question a conspiracy theory and then dismissing it. We have to be informed. I suggest taking the time to go through each aspect (article, video) that she includes in this post and look at the sources, not just the claims.

Is gain of function research inherently dangerous? What is Dr. Fauci's connection to the Wuhan lab and to the pandemic? Who is Bill Gates? What are his connections to every single global health care initiative and institution? What are his connections to major media outlets? 

Read the whole thing at LeilaMiller.net* (and read or watch the embedded things!).

*I have removed the link to Leila's post because I think it was causing my site here to be flagged as dangerous (for "ads that are misleading or potential phishing" -- which obviously her post is not, nor does my site have ads). We will see if the problem is remedied. But I really do urge you to take the time to copy and paste her URL and go read for yourself! 

The arguments for abortion are the same as for divorce

 So says Leila Miller: 

7 Pro-Abortion Arguments that Work for Divorce, Too: The justifications for abortion and divorce are eerily similar

Why is it important to understand that the arguments for abortion and divorce are essentially identical? Because Catholics—and everyone else, really—need a wake-up call. I often say Catholics are against divorce in theory but not in practice, and that is not acceptable. We must be all in for God’s moral law and fight for truth at every turn. My hope is that when we find ourselves or others using these seductive, dangerous arguments to justify divorce, we will wake up, take note of the lie, and reverse course. In fact, let’s find new phrases and words to counter the false narratives above.

I totally agree with Leila!

And I would ask people to consider that no-fault, widespread divorce harms marriage, creating a situation where fornication is also widespread. And abortion on demand is, simply put, a result of fornication. Where it occurs in a marriage, it is the result of society giving up on that marriage; giving up on being willing to help a couple in trouble.

Let's resolve to oppose divorce. God hates divorce! 


Men, time to overcome your soft ways and fight!

Leila Miller and I wrote a piece to express our urgency: Men, this fight is yours -- women, let your men fight! Nay, encourage them! And then step out of the way!

Women for too long have taken the lead, especially in matters of church affairs. Priests spend all their days surrounded by women! Bishops only hear from women and their lives (and dioceses!) are run by women! Women love rules and carefulness and not offending anyone and being fussy. ENOUGH! 

Time for bishops to be men, to confidently calculate risks, and to do what needs to be done despite danger, real or perceived -- and only men can accomplish this rescue mission of freeing our leaders of their effeminacy. It won't be pretty, and women will feel that things are not done quite right, said quite right, thought quite right. That is okay! 

Catholic Men, Rise up and Fight!


A good reminder

My dear friend Leila Miller posts a good reminder, as we contemplate what I called on Twitter "the desolation of abomination" -- the desolate side altars at St. Peter's

However, in the midst of what seems to be the ongoing, orchestrated deconstruction of our Catholic patrimony, tradition, and treasures, we should neither despair nor lose our interior peace. After all, we know enough of prophesy and eschatology to realize that as we approach the final triumph, the Body of Christ has to pass through a very dark time, imitating the Passion of our Savior. 

 In fact, for a few years now, I have been referring everyone to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 675-677. I have memorized the numbers and much of the content, and I suggest you do the same. You’ll feel strangely better about what we are enduring, and you’ll begin to understand that this crisis in the Church, even at the highest levels, is to be expected. Now, this knowledge won’t magically remove the suffering of this cross; however, you’ll find consolation in knowing that things are not actually out of control. God is in control, and His plan is being realized...

She summarizes the passages from the Catechism this way:

The faith of many will be shaken in the final trial of the Church.

Via the persecution that comes to the faithful, the mystery of sin will be unveiled (dare we say “unmasked”?). 

Something that looks and feels just like true religion will deceive many souls. 

This false religion seems to offer man a solution to his earthly problems.

The cost of this “solution”? Apostasy from the truth.

Man will put himself at the center of all things, glorifying himself while displacing God. 

Man will work to fix and “save” all the things of this earth (think: social justice utopia), forgetting the transcendent. 

There will be no historical triumph of the Church through a progressive ascendancy. 

The true Church will be humiliated, beaten, crushed, and crucified by the world—just like our Lord.

God will claim the victory only after the final unleashing of evil on this earth.

The Final Judgment will be fearsome. The Resurrection will come. 

Get ready.

Read the whole thing. A good, supernatural shot in the arm.