Showing posts with label Fr. Pokorsky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fr. Pokorsky. Show all posts

The devil... wants you distracted

Lots of talk about the devil these days, and chatter about exorcism movies and so on. It's unsettled me a bit, not because I don't give the devil his due, but, well... I wasn't sure why.

Then Fr. Jerry Pokorsky commented, in this little email exchange* (that included my husband):

From my point of view, a big yawner. Any investment opportunities? Sounds like a great growth stock. Steve Rossetti and the rest will certainly cash in on this one.

The Archdiocese of Boston [and mine, of Worcester] is responding to the Satanic Temple’s “SatanCon” event in Boston with scheduled eucharistic adoration, Catholic devotions, and “intense prayer.”

Here's what would not be "a yawner," he goes on to say: just imagine if you woke up to this news flash:

The American bishops are responding to Biden's promotion of abortion, gay grooming (à la Fr. James Martin, SJ), and genital mutilation (including at many hospitals, including of course children's hospitals, staffed by Catholic personnel) throughout the US Government. They plan scheduled eucharistic adoration, Catholic devotions, and “intense prayer"  -- to give bishops the courage to excommunicate pro-abortion Catholic politicians and others complicit in these moral crimes. The USCCB is preparing a "Fortnight of Excommunication" program of prayer for the purpose.

Ah, right. 

Like many current events that cause a stir along with the immediate, coordinated changing out of avatars and draping of flags, these satan-adjacent activities are a distraction. Not because the devil doesn't exist and isn't out to snatch our souls, but because he does, and he is.

Catholics and the Ukraine

I'm old enough to remember a few wars that I do not think the US should have been involved in. Nation-building as foreign policy has not be successful for us or for others. As a person of Arab descent (my father was Egyptian, a Moslem -- as we wrote it back then), I also remember a Middle East that, precarious as it was, was not as divided and devastated as it is now.

So I welcome Fr. Jerry Pokorsky's careful analysis of the situation in the Ukraine: Propaganda and the Ukraine War. I admit that one of the red flags for me early on, warning me that we were in propaganda territory, was... flags -- Ukraine flags popping up immediately in people's avatars, on the heels of Covid propaganda emoji, as if people couldn't wait to jump on the bandwagon offered by a state-media conglomerate that had certainly not been transparent until that point. 

Catholics hear a lot from our leaders on the subject of this conflict, just as we heard a lot about viruses and lockdowns. But most of it is unwarranted retailing of talking points from parts unknown and unexamined. We can't trust sources that so blatantly demonstrated their inability to separate fact from propaganda in the previous two years, not to mention decades. 

And that readiness of churchmen to pass along untrustworthy information is an issue that relates to the delicate nature of obedience and authority, something that is so precious in our Church that it must never be abused. Yet it has been. One important point that Fr. Pokorsky touches upon is that sometimes we just don't know what is going on or what our response should be, and we shouldn't act as if we do.

It's good to see a priest offering correction to his confreres.

The meaning of propaganda has evolved from simple advertising to promoting biased and misleading information. The art of gleaning facts from various propaganda outlets has become increasingly difficult. Indeed, the mainstream media have mostly become organs of institutional (primarily liberal) propaganda.

Catholic priests, especially in their official capacities, must not distort the Gospel message by repeating propaganda and stay in their lane when enunciating Christian principles. But as Americans, the clergy also have a right to political views, provided they make clear distinctions separating their religious office from their secular opinions. This article is written by an American (call me “Jerry”) and concludes with a brief priestly exhortation (call me “Father”).

After a detailed and helpful characterization of the various points of view about the conflict (which should also be informed by something my husband wrote regarding the religious background, here -- part one is embedded), Fr. Pokorsky criticizes another priest for his undue pressure on conscience:

Exercising priestly authority, the clerics must dutifully decry the carnage and encourage a just solution. The laity has the responsibility to address the mess. As Americans – distinctly and consciously apart from their official religious duties – priests have a right to express political views, careful to avoid violating the consciences of those with opposing views.

The Dominican chaplain of the Knights of Columbus recently wrote that the Knights of Columbus Ukraine Solidarity Fund financially supports Ukraine war refugees. As long as the funds do not line the pockets of Ukraine politicians and oligarchs, the fund sounds like a noble enterprise.

However, the priest violated the boundaries separating the religious from the secular spheres when he writes — as the appointed chaplain of the Knight of Columbus: “In the face of the ongoing tragedy of war, injustice and humanitarian disaster inflicted by Russia on Ukraine, no one can remain indifferent. As the world continues to witness the steadfast struggle for freedom that the people of Ukraine endure….” 

Read it all. 

Market share? or the Cross

Fr. Jerry Pokorsky hit the nail on the head. His comment happened to be about this article: The Church of 2050, an article that tells us that in the next generation, "the future of the Church in the United States may also be the 'poor Church that is for the poor' of which Pope Francis has spoken."

Fr. P's comment could have been about any of the many articles and posts urging us to follow this or that new program or process or somehow "go all in" to our local church and prove our devotion by energetically doing things and participating in its life, as defined by those who are presiding over its demise.

His comment (in a private email, with permission to quote):

What's missing in most of these pieces -- including the orthodox ones -- is the salvation of souls. We all tend to treat the Church like one, big, influential organization that has an immense market  share.  We want MORE market share, dammit!  

Let's forget about market share and preach the Cross for the salvation of souls.  Everything else will fall into place.

The Path Out

In case anyone cares what a housewife in Central Massachusetts thinks about war in Ukraine, I will say, I don't know.

I know that I am scarred by the total collapse of trust and honor in the news. On the one hand, disinformation, lack of trust. On the other, controlled opposition, designed to entrap the unsuspecting.

Meanwhile, here we are in the middle, in the dark, being asked to support rationalizations that could lead to WWIII and facing serious issues here at home while waiting for things to simmer down. And no, I don't think it's embarrassing to question how our standard of living suddenly tanked while some people in the world are facing worse. First, that disparity will always be true (whichever side of it we are on at the moment -- one entity's suffering is not cause for discounting the suffering of another, and it's possible that they are connected); second, it won't help anyone if we Americans are plunged into using our mental energy to cope with drastic changes in our day-to-day lives for no reason

Prescinding from the question (a real one) of whether our prosperity was well derived and stewarded in the first place, the fact remains that there is something that doesn't ring true about its manner of being disrupted, with the inevitable burden on the poor, and the new crisis that we are virtually unilaterally being forced to sign on to, now that the old one has lost its grip. 

That's all I've got. There's something not right about all of it. 

Early articles to help with critical thinking while the information is being sorted out (if that ever happens), chosen with the hope of avoiding the two pitfalls, mentioned above. I don't claim that they do more than say, "I don't know!" with a healthy dose of "we must 'preach Christ and Him crucified'":

The Ukraine Mess: Points to ponder about narratives, criteria, possible responses by Fr. Jerry Pokorsky -- an outline, not an academic investigation, but important nonetheless. Just war criteria are not abstract idealisms but common-sense guides for prudent action, and as such, important to have in mind.

You'll need to have your sarcasm meter on for these; Jones and Zmirak are not endorsing, they are describing; Warren is observing and giving the only possible prescription:

Russia is Mordor, but the West is Sodom by Jason Jones and John Zmirak

The Path Out by David Warren

 As I read more, I will share more. 

How to define racism


Fr. Pokorsky (a good friend) writes on the subject of how to define racism, spurred by one of the endless social-justice messages he (like all diocesan priests) receives from the chancery. 

It's true, what he says, that these messages (and policies) are written by faceless hirelings, not by the bishops themselves, a state of affairs that bishops should address. The professional Catholics behind the scenes are immersed in progressive (or outright Marxist) politics and certainly don't have the grace of state to be guiding the diocese in matters of faith and morals (and wouldn't even if their politics were better grounded).

"As with every violation of the Ten Commandments, the bishops should decry racism, carefully defined. But they have no right to implicitly (if unwittingly) invite the overthrow of our civilization with charges of “systemic racism” as defined by cultural Marxists."