What Emily Oster said in The Atlantic and why it is not acceptable

[Updates below!]

In my previous post I was focused on making sure that the religious leaders and thinkers who enabled Covid lockdowns and vaccine injustice were included in a summary rejection of Emily Oster's call for amnesty for that (by no means over) episode.

Her arguments are so spurious that it boggles my mind. But I encourage you to take the 12 minutes necessary to watch Doug Wilson's careful fisking of her piece, with his emphasis on what the true objection is to what happened (and her role in it) -- censorship and loss of freedom: 



It's not over. Medical trust is, as Wilson says, at a low point. Just one example, but an important one: The law [in California] authorizes regulators to discipline physicians who deviate from the "contemporary scientific consensus."

It's all forgiveness and harmony with Oster now, when mid-term elections loom, but what about then:







I'll update this post when I have more commentary links to share.

UPDATE: Do watch this short video from Leila Miller, in which she points out the dangers of "Truth Inversion" -- failing to put first things first. As exemplified in the abortion struggle and not least of all, the lockdown debacle. 

The U.S. Coast Guard is offering up to $50,000 signing bonuses in an effort to bolster recruitment, after the number of guardsmen has plummeted, in large part due to the military's strict COVID-19 vaccination mandate.

According to internal USCG documents obtained by Fox News Digital from October detailing fiscal year 2023 workforce planning, "Culinary Specialist," or "CS," level recruits could receive bonuses up to $50,000 each.

Active-duty Coast Guard Lt. Chad Coppin called the $50,000 CS-level bonuses, which would involve positions such as cooks, "absolutely unheard of."

 "This means the USCG response to future disasters like Hurricane Ian will suffer, and lives will be lost due to lack of personnel, a readiness issue that the USCG is voluntarily compounding... overall, the USCG is short over 2,700 members," Coppin said.


"We are not meeting recruiting goals, and a service that was once difficult to get into is now offering $50K bonuses, increasing age limits and lowering standards in order to try and fill billets," he continued.

According to an internal "Retention & Recruiting Study" from September by the Office of Strategic Workforce Planning, the vaccination mandate has led directly to personnel shortages.

 

The great tragedy of the lockdown was not caused by the people who made innocent mistakes—like wearing cloth masks or wiping down counters—in the mistaken belief that they were preventing the spread of the virus. The tragedy occurred because, once the appointed experts had issued their edicts, no one was allowed to question them. From the early days of the Covid era, there were eminently qualified scientists offering reasonable arguments against the lockdown policies. (See the Great Barrington Declaration, which has now drawn nearly one million signatures.) But they were not given a hearing. On the contrary, they were treated as pariahs, in many cases stripped of their academic credentials. How about an amnesty for them, now that their ideas have been vindicated?

 


"Are you concerned that [on a reality TV show with Matt Hancock] we are seeing a more explicit conversation about coronavirus and its impact than you'll hear in Congress or in Parliament" -- Russell Brand on "moving on." Full disclosure, I am not as willing to let individuals off the hook as Brand seems to be! But his video here has many important points about the implications of memory-holing the events of the lockdown.



3 comments:

  1. Relevant Radio is not innocent either

    ReplyDelete
  2. At 2 months post partum this summer, my baby and I got covid. I had no symptoms and she was snotty nosed. A few months later, we both got RSV. She was hospitalized in PICU and I got pneumonia.

    RSV is eating up families left and right this season (and it never went away for the summer) because of the weakness of our collective immune systems due to the lock downs.

    The domestic violence shelter I work at saw shocking increase in IPV, including homicides that simply would not have happened had the lock downs not taken place. These were women that we were in the middle of helping them escape, the rug was pulled out from under all plans, and they were suddenly unable to leave (no where to go -- we had to close the shelter!) and trapped with their abuser. Their abuser who just lost his job so was particularly dangerous.

    At its most generous, perhaps the lock downs prevented some people from dying of covid. But it directly caused an increase in IPV, domestic homicide, child abuse and child sexual abuse. Those numbers are conveniently ignored when people talk about the efficacy of the lock downs. The loss of life may well have just been a wash considering the domestic violence and suicides that came from the lock downs!

    ReplyDelete